By Charlie Savage
President-elect Donald Trump’s demand that Senate Republicans surrender their role in vetting his nominees poses an early test of whether his second term will be more radical than his first.
Over the weekend, Trump insisted on social media that Republicans select a new Senate majority leader willing to call recesses during which he could unilaterally appoint personnel, a process that would allow him to sidestep the confirmation process. His allies immediately applauded the idea, intensifying pressure on GOP lawmakers to acquiesce.
The demand to weaken checks and balances and take for himself some of the legislative branch’s usual power underscored Trump’s authoritarian impulses. While there is no obvious legal obstacle to Trump’s request, it would be an extraordinary violation of constitutional norms. There is no historical precedent for a deliberate and wholesale abandonment by the Senate of its function of deciding whether to confirm or reject the president’s choices to bestow with government power.
Ed Whelan, a legal commentator who has supported Trump’s judicial nominees but been critical of Trump himself, sounded the alarm on Tuesday in an essay for the conservative National Review. The once and future president appeared to be contemplating “an awful and anti-constitutional idea,” he wrote.
Recess appointees who take office without Senate confirmation wield the full powers of their offices until the end of the next Senate session. Each congressional session typically lasts a year, so anyone who receives a recess appointment from Trump in early 2025 could remain in office until the end of 2026.
The Constitution normally requires the president to obtain the Senate’s consent to appoint top officials to the executive branch, in part to prevent the White House from installing unfit people to high office.
But in the early days of the country, when travel was by horse, the Senate was regularly out of session for months at a time and could not be readily recalled when a key vacancy arose and the country needed someone to fill it. As a result, the founders also wrote an exception into the Constitution, allowing presidents to temporarily fill vacancies without Senate confirmation when it was in recess.
The recess appointment clause is an anachronism in the modern era, since the Senate meets throughout the year and can easily reconvene when necessary. But even though the clause’s original purpose is obsolete, it remains part of the Constitution.
While some of Trump’s nominees are expected to be members of Congress who will presumably be easily approved by the Republican-controlled Senate, recess appointments would remove a critical check on Trump at a time when he has flirted with also giving some powerful roles to more extreme allies who could face trouble getting confirmed.
As Alexander Hamilton wrote in the Federalist Papers, essays in defense of the Constitution, the mere existence of this confirmation process would act as a safeguard against the appointment of “unfit” officials.
“A man who had himself the sole disposition of offices, would be governed much more by his private inclinations and interests, than when he was bound to submit the propriety of his choice to the discussion and determination of a different and independent body, and that body an entire branch of the legislature,” Hamilton wrote.
The Supreme Court has said that Senate recesses of at least 10 days are sufficient to allow a president to sidestep confirmation for appointees. To set Trump up, the majority leader would have to be willing to bring up a motion to adjourn for at least that amount of time. The Senate would then hold a simple majority vote.
If no adjournment motion passes, the chamber would remain in session. If Republicans hold a narrow 53-47 majority, it would take four Republicans to break away and join Democrats to thwart Trump’s proposal.
There are several reasons to believe that guardrails and bulwarks that sometimes held Trump back in his norm-shattering first term will be weaker in his second term.
His initial team in 2017 was often dysfunctional, but those who stayed learned how to wield power more effectively. His own political appointees sometimes reined in his impulses, but this time, his allies are determined not to appoint officials who would see a duty to constrain him. His agenda was sometimes blocked by courts, but his appointments have shifted the judiciary in his direction.
And in Trump’s first term, Republican lawmakers who had independent standing demonstrated occasional willingness to denounce his rhetoric or check his more disruptive proposals. But over time, the Republican Party has become more accepting of Trump’s propensity to cross lines. And he wore down, outlasted or drove out his GOP critics — suggesting that Republicans in Congress may be even more pliable.
Trump’s demand that the Senate step aside and let him make mass recess appointments is a bold first move to test the waters.
While previous presidents have occasionally made some recess appointments, none has ever tried to systematically bypass Senate approval to unilaterally fill their administrations. It remains to be seen whether Republican senators, fearful of Trump’s ability to end their careers by backing a primary challenger, will give up one of the most important powers and prerogatives of their office.
On social media, Trump asserted that allowing him to make recess appointments would avoid what he portrayed as past delays in pushing through nominees, saying, “We need positions filled IMMEDIATELY!”
Gurgaon Escorts Agency take pride in delivering companionship that suits every taste and preference. Our selection includes diverse beauties, each promising a unique experience. From relaxed evenings to adventurous outings, our escorts are dedicated to making every moment spent together truly captivating and unforgettable.